Jurnal Manajemen Program Studi Manajemen Universitas Bunda Mulia

Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Focus and Scope

Business Management Journal Program Studi Manajemen  is periodicals published by Management Department of Universitas BUnda Mulia. BMJ disseminates theoretical and applied research in the fields of:

Strategic Management

Strategic management issues address how companies maintain their competitiveness in a changing environment. The study can be both theoretical and applied testing that results from current best practice of organizations and firms.

Human Resource

People and their knowledge are assets for the company. The demand to develop human resource management is higher along with increasingly sophisticated technological advancements such as artificial intelligence that can replace the tasks of the workers. Research in the field of human resources will open insight for readers on how the challenges faced by workers in the future.


Marketing has evolved from simply producing goods or services that are in line with customer needs, increasing value for customers and maintaining customer loyalty. In line with the 4.0 industrial revolution, the concept of digital marketing has become the main marketing strategy today in many companies.


The topics covered is strategic financing decisions such as capital structure and dividend policy decisions; tactical financing decisions such as initial public offerings, financial restructuring, and lease financing; short-term financial management such as cash, inventory, and receivables management; and special topics such as risk management, bankruptcy, reorganization and liquidation, corporate mergers, and multinational financial management.

Business Digital

Digital businesses use technology to create new value in business models, customer experiences and the internal capabilities that support its core operations. The term includes both digital-only brands and traditional players that are transforming their businesses with digital technologies.


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

All entries will go through several stages of evaluation. The first stage is the desk evaluation conducted by the editors. At this stage the things that are evaluated include: article format (referring to the template), writing a reference list (APA Style), consistency of citations with bibliography, typo letters. The second stage is a review conducted by bestari partners across universities. Posts will be reviewed by bestari partners after passing the desk evaluation. Mitra Bestari will review the content of the writing in depth, such as the latest theories that form the basis of research, the existence of problem gaps, and the research methods used. Articles will be declared eligible for publication if the bestari partner has declared qualified



Publication Frequency

Business Management Journal publishes periodical scientific articles, March (volume 1) and September (volume 2) in a year.


Open Access Policy

Business Management Journal is open access resource for everyone. It implies to all of the contents of the articles in this journal are available for free to the public. Registered user are free to downloaded, shared, mixed, reused, all of manuscripts in this journal. However, it should acknowledge the author and share with the same license since the copyright of the manuscript remains to the author.



Publication Ethics


Publication Ethic


Business Management Journal (BMJ) is a peer-reviewed journal. This journal follows guidelines from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) facing all aspects of publication ethics and, in particular, how to handle cases of research and publication misconduct. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the Editor-in-Chief, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer­­­­­ and the publisher (Indonesian Journal Publisher). This journal is dedicated to following best practices on ethical matters, errors, and retractions. The prevention of publication malpractice is one of the important responsibilities of the editorial board. Any kind of unethical behavior is not acceptable, and the journals do not tolerate plagiarism in any form.

BMJ adapts COPE to meet high quality standard of ethics for publisher, editors, authors, and reviewers. As an essential issue, publication ethics needs to be explained clearly to improve the quality of the research worldwide. In this part, we explain the standard for editors, authors, and reviewers. Publisher don’t have right to interfere with the integrity of the contents and only support to publish in timely manner.

For Editors

  1. Based on the review report of the editorial review board, the editor can accept, reject, or request modifications to the manuscript.
  2. Editors should be responsible for every articles published in BMJ
  3. The editors may communicate with other editors or reviewers in making the final decision.
  4. An editor has to evaluate the manuscript objectively for publication, judging each on its quality without looking to nationality, ethnicity, political beliefs, race, religion, gender, seniority, or institutional affiliation of the authors. He/she should decline his/her assignment when there is a potential of conflict of interest.
  5. Editors need to ensure the document sent to the reviewer does not contain the information of the author, vice versa.
  6. Editors’ decision should be informed to authors accompanied by reviewers’ comments unless they contain offensive or libelous remarks.
  7. Editors should respect requests from authors that an individual should not review the submission, if these are well-reasoned and practicable.
  8. Editors and all staffs should guarantee the confidentiality of the submitted manuscript.
  9. Editors will be guided by COPE flowcharts if there is a suspected misconduct or disputed authorship.

For Reviewers

Reviewers need to comment on ethical questions and possible research and publication misconduct.

  1. Reviewers will do the work in timely manner and should notify editor if they can not complete the work.
  2. Reviewers need to keep the confidentiality of the manuscript.
  3. Reviewers should not accept to review the manuscripts in which there is potential conflict of interest between them and any of the authors.

For Authors

  1. Author(s) affirm that the material has not been previously published and that they have not trans­ferred elsewhere any rights to the article.
  2. Author(s) should ensure the originality of the work and that they have properly cited others’ work in accordance with the format of the reference.
  3. Author(s) should not engage in plagiarism or self-plagiarism.
  4. Author(s) should ensure that they follow the authorship criteria that are taken from Jibeka that are explained in instruction for the author.
  5. Authors should not submit the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently. It is also expected that the author will not publish redundant manuscripts or manuscripts describing the same research in more than one journal.
  6. Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. Others who have made significant contributions must be listed as co-authors. Authors also ensure that all the authors have seen and agreed to the submitted version of the manuscript and their inclusion of names as co-authors.
  7. The author(s) haven’t suggested any personal information that may make the identity of the patient recognizable in any form of description part, photograph, or pedigree.
  8. Author(s) should give the editor the data and details of the work if there are suspicions of data falsification or fabrication.
  9. If at any point in time, the author(s) discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in the submitted manuscript, then the error or inaccuracy must be reported to the editor.
  10. Authors of the journal should clarify everything that may cause conflict of interests such as work, research expenses, consul­tant expenses, and intellectual property on the document of PHJ form disclosure.


Editors make every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in its publications. However, Editors of make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness or suitability for any purpose of the Content and disclaim all such representations and warranties whether express or implied to the maximum extent permitted by law. Any views expressed in this publication are the views of the authors and are not necessarily the views of the Editors.