Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Psibernetika (P-ISSN 1979-3707, E- ISSN 2581-0871) accpets only research article from various psychological research methods including quantitative and qualitative method. Psibernetika particularly interest on Industrial and Organisational Psychology research articles but not limited to other psychology areas including:
1. Social Psychology
2. Clinical Psychology
3. Developmental Psychology
4. Positive Psychology
5. Educational Psychology
 
 

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Every article that goes to the editorial staff will be selected through Initial Review processes by Editorial Board. Then, the articles will be sent to the Mitra Bebestari/ peer reviewer and will go to the next selection by Double Blind Preview Process. After that, the articles will be returned to the authors to revise. These processes take a month for a maximum time. In the each manuscript, Mitra Bebestari/ peer reviewer will be rated from the substantial and technical aspects. Mitra Bebestari/ peer reviewer that collaboration with Psibernetika. 

All submitted manuscripts are evaluated by editorial staff. Manuscripts that evaluated by editors that lack of research method and inappropiate to journal criteria will be rejected without external review. Eligible manuscripts which suit with journal criteria and have interesting will be sent to double blind reviewers. The editors then make a decision based on the reviewer's recommendation from among several possibilities : rejected, revision required, or accepted.

In summary, the review process as following :

  1. Author submit the manuscript 
  2. Editor Evaluation (some manuscript are rejected or returned before the review process) 
  3. Double Blind peer review process 
  4. Editor Decision 
  5. Confirmation to the author for revision
  6. Publish

An article will be rejected for publication due to various considerations, including:

  1. The article is not a scientific research result.
  2. The fundamental methodological errors.
  3. The author refuses to make suggestions of improvements provided by the reviewer without a logical basis.
  4. There is an indication of plagiarism.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.