The paper aims at elaborating issues in Indonesian curriculum 2013, the latest curriculum in the country and address some issues in the pedagogical issues. Curriculum, considering its vital role in nation wide education, should get tremendous attention from all stakeholders: the government through the ministry of education, the school leaders, teachers, society and students. As curriculum plays as the national standards, all the executing stakeholder set their classroom aims, assessment, and plans accordingly. Based on the rationale, it is imperative to look at the curriculum from the lens of multicultural education because Indonesia is a diverse country. A curriculum that is responsive to the cultures in education setting would enhance the equality in education that eventually education for all can be achieved. This study employed systematic literature review as reseach method. The researcher examined literatures about related to culturally responsive teaching and the evidence of educational problems that currently happens from current published journals as well as important books related to culturally responsive teaching. The results indicated that there is a gap between the reality in the field and the educational system that has been established. A curriculum that is responsive to students’ culture urges to be there in the curriculum, whether it is from the teacher or the stakeholders. In addition, the higher education also started to step forward to curriculum that retains students’ culture.

Alsubaie, M. A. (2016). Teacher Involvement in Curriculum Development. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(9), 106–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1393517

Asmara, Y., & Sukadana, I. (2017). Mengapa Angka Putus Sekolah Masih Tinggi? (Studi Kasus Kabupaten Buleleng Bali). E-Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan Universitas Udayana, 5(12), 1347–1383.

Banks, J. A. (1993). Multicultural Education: Historical Development, Dimensions, and Practice. Review of Research in Education, 19, 3–49.

Banks, J. A. (2004). Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives. Wiley.

Bjork, C. (2004). Decentralisation in education, institutional culture and teacher autonomy in Indonesia. International Review of Education, 50(3–4), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3358-2_7

Bouckaert, M., & Kools, Q. (2018). Teacher educators as curriculum developers: exploration of a professional role. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(1), 32–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1393517

BPS. (2019). Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia 2019. BPS-Statistics Indonesia.

Cummings, J. E. (2009). Effects of A Culturally Responsive Teaching Program on Teacher Attitudes, Perceptions, and Practices. In ProQuest LLC (Issue May). Boston College.

Gandana, I., & Parr, G. (2013). Professional identity, curriculum and teaching Intercultural Communication: An Indonesian case study. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 26(3), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2013.833620

Gay, G. (2004). Curriculum theory and multicultural education. In Handbook of research on multicultural education (Issue 968, pp. 30–49).

Gay, G. (2018). Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice. (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.

Hammond, Z. (2014). Culturally responsive teaching and the brain. Corwin Press.

Kavel, R. (2017). THE IMPACT OF TEACHER ’ S KNOWLEDGE AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EXPERIENCES ON THE CULTURALLY RESPONSIVE TEACHING PRACTICES THEY IMPLEMENT IN LITERACY by Rebecca L . Kavel A dissertation submitted to the faculty of The University of North Carolina at Cha.

Ladson-Billings, G. (1992). Reading Between the Lines and Beyond the Pages: A Culturally Relevant Approach to Literacy Teaching. Theory Into Practice, 31(4), 312. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=crh&AN=5204300&site=ehost-live

Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: aka the remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 74–84.

Liu, J., & Fang, F. (Gabriel). (2017). Perceptions, awareness and perceived effects of home culture on intercultural communication: Perspectives of university students in China. System, 67, 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.04.003

Mansilla, V. B., & Jackson, A. (2013). Educating for Global Competence: Learning Redefined for an Interconnected World. In Mastering Global Literacy, Contemporary Perspectives (pp. 1–24). Solution Tree.

Meyzilia, A., Darsiharjo, & Ruhimat, M. (2018). Hubungan Antara Lokasi Sekolah terhadap Metode Mengajar Guru dan Hasil Ujian Nasional Geografi. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial, 4(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.23887/jiis.v4i1.13948

Mulenga, I. M. (2018). Conceptualization and Definition of a Curriculum. Journal of Lexicography and Terminology, 2(2), 1–23.

Munandar, M. I. (2019). The beliefs and practices of Indonesian high-school EFL teachers regarding the teaching and learning of culture and interculturality [VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON]. http://hdl.handle.net/10063/8459

Murray, R., Shea, M., & Shea, B. (2004). Avoiding the one-size-fits-all curriculum: Textsets, inquiry, and differentiating instruction. Childhood Education, 81(1).

Nieto, S. (2004). Affirming Diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education. In 4th edition (4th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.

Purwoko, H. (2010). Muatan Sosial-Budaya Dalam Buku Teks Pelajaran Bahasa Asing. Parole: Journal of Linguistics and Education, 1, 97–118. https://doi.org/10.14710/parole.v1i0.812

Varghese, M., Morgan, B., Johnston, B., & Johnson, K. A. (2005). Theorizing Language Teacher Identity: Three Perspectives and Beyond. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 4(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327701jlie0401_2