Metadiscourse is an integral element of writing since it helps writers to organize and shape their arguments, but at the same time reflect their stance towards both the content and readers. There have been numerous studies concerning metadiscourse markers. However, little research has been done where Americans are directly compared with Indonesians. Furthermore, most of them have focused more on opinion, editorial, and sport articles, but not many have examined business ones. Considering this situation, the writer has become interested in investigating whether there are similarities and differences between how American and Indonesian writers incorporate metadiscourse markers in their opinion and business articles. The data for this research is taken from articles from two online newspapers, i.e. Washington Examiner and The Jakarta Post with a corpus size of 7,000 words for each type of article. The AntConc software version 3.5.6 by Anthony (2018) is used to analyze the data. The findings of the study reveal that there are some similarities and differences in the way American and Indonesian writers employ these markers in the writing of opinion and business articles.

metadiscourse markers; opinion and business articles; American and Indonesian writers

Anthony, L. (2018). AntConc (Version 3.5.6) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from http://www.laurenceanthony.net/software

Dafouz-Milne, E. (2008). The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, (1), 95 - 113.

Hyland, K. (1999). Talking to students: metadiscourse in introductory coursebooks. English for Specific Purposes 18, (1), 3 - 26.

Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 133 - 151.

Hyland, K. and Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: a reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25, (2), 156 - 177.

Khedri, M., Heng, C.S., and Ebrahimi, S.F. (2013). An exploration of interactive metadiscourse markers in academic research article abstracts in two disciplines. Discourse Studies, 15, (3), 319 - 331.

Kuhi, D. and Mojood, M. (2014). Metadiscourse in newspaper genre: a cross-linguistic study of English and Persian editorials. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 98, 1046 - 1055.

Ozdemir, N. O., and Longo, B. (2014). Metadiscourse Use in Thesis Abstracts: A Cross-cultural Study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 141, 59 - 63.

Siddique, A.R., Mahmood, M.A., and Iqbal, J. (2018). Metadiscourse analysis of Pakistani English newspaper editorials: a corpus-based study. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8, (1), 146 – 163.

Sukma, B.P. and Sujatna, E.T.S. (2014). Interpersonal metadiscourse markers in opinion articles: a study of texts written by Indonesian writers. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 3, (2), 16 - 21.

Tavanpour, N., Goudarzi, Z., and Farnia, M. (2016). Interactional metadiscourse markers in sports news in newspapers: a cross-cultural study of American and Iranian columnists. The Philologist, 1, 1 - 13.