ENHANCING AUDITOR PROFESSIONAL SKEPTICISM: THE ROLE OF INDEPENDENCE, EXPERIENCE, LEADERSHIP STYLE, AND COMPETENCE

Afly Yessie

Abstract


Background: Professional skepticism is essential for auditors in completing their tasks.

Objective: This study examines the effect of independence, experience, leadership style, and competence on auditor professional skepticism.

Research Methods: This research was conducted at a Public Accounting Firm in South Jakarta, Indonesia. The number of samples was determined by random sampling method, with the total number of samples are 100 respondents. The data analysis technique used is Multiple Linear Regression using SEM-PLS.

Research Results: The results of this study indicate that auditor independence and leadership style do not affect auditor professional skepticism. However, auditors' experience and competence affect auditors' professional skepticism. This suggests the need to emphasise developing work experience, increasing competence, and fostering leadership styles that strengthen auditor skepticism. In practice, it can be improved by conducting training, career coaching, and leadership support for auditors to ensure that they have sufficient competence and experience and solid skepticism in evaluating information.

Originality/Novelty of Research: This study integrates four factors, namely independence, experience, leadership style, and competence, in explaining professional skepticism among auditors. This study explicitly examines “leadership style” in this context.


Keywords


Independence, Experience, Leadership Style, Competence, Professional Skepticism

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahadiansyah, F., Dewi, K., & Fuadah, L. (2019). The Effect of Workload, Experience, Personality and Professional Scepticism on The Accuracy of Giving Audit Opinion. N Proceedings of the 4th Sriwijaya Economics, Accounting, and Business Conference (SEABC 2018), 458–467. Scitepress. https://doi.org/10.5220/0008441304580467

Andreas, A., Zarefar, A., & Rasuli, H. M. (2016). Analysis of factors affecting the auditors’ professional scepticism and audit result quality-the case of Indonesian government auditors (Vol. 14). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309249977

Attamimi, M. F., & Riduwan, A. (2015). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Skeptisme Profesional Auditor Akhmad Riduwan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indonesia (STIESIA) Surabaya. Jurnal Ilmu & Riset Akuntansi, 4(7).

Aulia, D. S., & Suryono, B. (2016). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi, Pengalaman Audit, dan Interpersonal Trust terhadap Skeptisme Profesional Auditor Bambang Suryono Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indonesia (STIESIA) Surabaya. Jurnal Ilmu Dan Riset Akutansi, 5(5).

Basuki, M. F. A., Sunaryo, K., & Kusumawardhani, I. (2020). Pengaruh Independensi, Pengalaman, Kompetensi, Gaya Kepemimpinan, danBeban Kerja Auditor Terhadap Skeptisme Profesional Auditor. Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis Dan Akutansi (JEBA), 22(3).

Cahyadi, A., & Rikawati, R. (2019). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Memengaruhi Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor Internal Pada PTKIN Badan Layanan Umum. AKTSAR: Jurnal Akuntansi Syariah, 2(2), 147. https://doi.org/10.21043/aktsar.v2i2.5851

Chen, Y.-H., Wang, K.-J., & Liu, S.-H. (2023). How Personality Traits and Professional Skepticism Affect Auditor Quality? A Quantitative Model. Sustainability, 15(2), 1547. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021547

Chiang, C. (2016). Conceptualising the linkage between professional scepticism and auditor independence. Pacific Accounting Review, 28(2), 180–200. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-08-2015-0034

Christina. (2018). Faktor- Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Sumatera. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntasnsi Dan Ekonomi, 3(1), 102–119.

Curtis, R. K. (2014). Breaking the Barrier-An Examination into the Current State of Professional Skepticism (University of Connecticut). University of Connecticut. Retrieved from https://opencommons.uconn.edu/srhonors_theses

Hadisantoso, E., Nurdin, E., & Akib, M. (2022). The Effect of Competence and Independence on Professional Skepticism and Audit Quality the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Site Using OJS 3 PKP Optimized. ATESTASI: JURNAL ILMIAH AKUNTANSI, 5(1), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.33096/atestasi.v5i1.1075

Hanjani, A. (2014). Pengaruh Etika Auditor, Pengalaman Auditor, Fee Audit, dan Motivasi Auditor terhadap Kualitas Audit (Studi pada Auditor KAP di Semarang). Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 3(2), 1–9. Retrieved from http://ejournal-s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting

Hasanati, Akram, & Irwan, M. (2017). Pengaruh Tindakan Supervisi, Kompleksitas Tugas dan Profesionalisme Auditor terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Auditor. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Investasi, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.18158

Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia. (2021a). Akuntan Publik Standar Audit 200 (Revisi 2021). Jakarta. Retrieved from http://www.iapi.or.id

Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia. (2021b). Standar Audit 230 (Revisi 2021). Retrieved from http://www.iapi.or.id

Johari, R. J., Hati, T. M., & Sayed Hussin, S. A. H. (2022). Factors Influencing Auditors’ Professional Scepticism: Malaysian Evidence. Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance, 10(1), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujaf.2022.100125

Khairunnisa, H., Zairin, G. M., Amirul, S. M., Prihatni, R., & Rachman, H. (2025). Unveiling the Auditor’s Lens: Impact of Workload, Time Pressure, Professional Skepticism, and Competence to Fraud Detection. Studies in Business and Economics, 20(1), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.2478/SBE-2025-0005

Knechel, W. R., Krishnan, G. V., Pevzner, M., Bhaskar, L. S., & Velury, U. (2013). Audit Quality: Insights from the Academic Literature. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2040754

Lismawati, Rohman, A., & Chariri, A. (2017). Developing Improvement of Auditor’s Performance Model Using Professional Skepticism and Auditors Comfort as a Mediator. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), 8(12), 27–37. Retrieved from http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp27http://http://www.iaeme.com/ijciet/issues.asp?JType=IJCIET&VType=8&IType=12http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/issues.asp?JType=IJCIET&VType=8&IType=12

Munidewi, I. A. B., Ludigdo, U., Djamhuri, A., & Andayani, W. (2025). Multifaceted Skepticism: A Comprehensive Approach in Auditing Practice. DLSU Business & Economics Review, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.59588/2243-786X.1054

Nurkholis, N. (2020). Pengaruh Pendidikan, Pelatihan, dan Pengalaman terhadap Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor. EKUITAS (Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan), 4(2), 246–265. https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2020.v4.i2.4376

Oktaviani, N. A., & Latrini, M. Y. (2018). Pengaruh Pengalaman Auditor, Tekanan Batas Waktu Audit dan Locus Of Control Internal pada Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 24(3), 1938–1963. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2018.v24.i03.p11

Petraşcu, D., & Cetinǎ, I. M. (2025). On Skepticism in the Practice of the Profession of Auditor. Studies in Business and Economics, 20(1), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2025-0012

Pratami, D. W., & Budiartha, I. K. (2019). Pengaruh Independensi dan Gaya Kepemimpinan Pada Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 722. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2019.v28.i01.p28

Said, L. L., & Munandar, A. (2018). The Influence of Auditor’s Professional Skepticism and Competence o Fraud Detection: The Role of Time Budget Pressure. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 15(1), 104–120. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2018.06

Sumanto, A., & Rosdiana, M. (2020). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Surabaya. Jurnal Analisa Akuntansi Dan Perpajakan, 4(1), 37–56.

Ta, T. T., Doan, T. N., Pham, D. C., & Tran, H. N. (2022). Factors Affecting the Professional Skepticism of Independent Auditors in Viet Nam. Cogent Business and Management, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2059043

Tarigan, M. U., & Susanti, P. B. (2013). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Etika, dan Fee Audit terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Akuntansi, 13(1).

Wowor, P. E., Nangoi, G., & Kalangi, L. (2021). Analisis Pengaruh Pengalaman, Independensi, Keahlian dan Situasi Audit Terhadap Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor (Studi pada BPK RI Perwakilan Provinsi Sulawesi Utara dan BPK RI Perwakilan Provinsi Gorontalo). Jurnal Riset Akutansi Dan Auditing, 12(1), 99–111.

Yuliana, D., & Puspita, A. F. (2025). The Effect of Professional Skepticism and Auditor Experience on the Ability to Detect Fraud with Time Pressure as a Moderating Variable. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 18(2), 272–290. https://doi.org/10.30813/JAB.V18I2.8104




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30813/jab.v19i1.9101

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis by The author of this article is licensed under a Deed - Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International - Creative Commons. Based on a work at https://journal.ubm.ac.id/index.php/akuntansi-bisnis.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at https://journal.ubm.ac.id/index.php/akuntansi-bisnis.