INVESTIGATING MALE AND FEMALE UNDERGRADUATE EFL STUDENTS’ ERRORS IN WRITING

Rex Stardy

Abstract


Writing in English can be difficult for language learners, including for Indonesian learners. That is why they still make a lot of errors in their writings. There are many studies that have explored errors in students’ writings. However, not many directly compares between male and female students. This study tries to fill the gap by exploring the types of errors made by the male and female students. In total, there are 20 students whose work is used as the data for this research. There are 10 male and 10 female students. The writer analyzes a paragraph they wrote on the topic of “Children should not be given smartphones.” The students are from the second semester from the English Department at Bunda Mulia University. The errors are grouped into grammatical and mechanical errors with more specific subcategories for each. The findings of the research shows that the most frequent error is related to tense and structure, while the least is related to subject-verb agreement. This is for both male and female students. The writer also found that between the male and female students, they made very similar errors. Based on the result, the writer suggests that the teacher pays more attention to the mechanical errors that are frequently made by the students because this kind of error is easier to improve compared to grammatical errors. Students can also use programs like Grammarly to help improve their writing.


Keywords


errors, writing, male and female students

Full Text:

PDF

References


Burman, D., Evans, D., Nunes, T. & Bell, D. (2008). Assessing deaf children's writing in primary school: Grammar and story development. Deafness and Education International, 10(2), 93-110.

Cumming, A. (2001). Learning to write in a second language: Two decades of research. International Journal of English Studies, 1(2), 1-23.

Fitria, T.N. (2020). Error analysis in using simple past tense found in students’ writing of recount text. Ahmad Dahlan Journal of English Studies, 7(1), 39-54.

Gulö, I. & Rahmawelly, T.V. (2018). An analysis of omission in students’ English writings. TEKNOSASTIK, 16(2), 55-59.

James, C. (1998). Errors in Language Learning and Use: Exploring Error Analysis. London: Routledge.

Kusumawardhani, P. (2015). Error analysis in writing an English narrative composition. Jurnal Lingua Cultura, 9(2), 132-136.

Murniati (2014). Grammatical errors in Intisari Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris 2013 from Buku Jagoan: Langsung Lulus UASBN SD /MI 2013. Journal of English Language and Culture, 4(2), 156-183.

Murniati (2021). Investigating the roles of implicit and explicit knowledge in the production of grammatical errors. Journal of English Language and Culture, 11(2), 100-109.

Na Phuket, P.R. & Othman, N.B. (2015). Understanding EFL students’ errors in writing. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(32), 99-106.

Ngangbam, H. (2016). An analysis of syntactic errors committed by students of English language class in the written composition of Mutah University: A case study. European Journal of English Language, Linguistics and Literature, 3(1), 1-13.

Richards, J. C. & Schmidt, R. (2002). Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics (3rd Ed.). London: Longman.

Singh, C.K.S., Singh, A.K.J., Razak, N.Q.A., & Ravinthar, T. (2017). Grammar errors made by ESL tertiary students in writing. English Language Teaching, 10(5), 16-27.

Tanihardjo, J. (2012). Interlingual errors in the argumentative essays: A case study of LS Private English Course. Journal of English Language and Culture, 2(1).

Tanihardjo, J. (2020). Sentence fragments in the Indonesian EFL students’ writings. Prosiding: Konferensi Linguistik Tahunan Atma Jaya (KOLITA) 18, 228-232.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30813/jelc.v14i2.5524

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.