POWER AND MANIPULATION DEPICTED BY MILES BRON IN GLASS ONION (2022)

Inkarizki Swedianisa Amalia, Slamet Setiawan, Syafi’ul Anam

Abstract


This study is aimed to uncover the types of power and investigate how far power can lead to manipulate others in a movie entitled Glass Onion (2022), written and directed by Rian Johnson. The director portrays Miles Bron's exercise of power as if he had invited his friends to play a murder mystery game on his private island in Greece, yet Blanc solves it promptly. Miles is giving his friends a genuine opportunity to kill him since he is disgruntled; in fact, Duke died of a poisoned drink in moments. Due to the disruption caused by Miles' murder mystery game, this study focuses on studying the power wielded by the main character, Miles Bron. The researchers employed qualitative approach by using content analysis method to analyze the movie. Therefore, the data will be displayed in the form of word, phrase, sentence, and utterance produced by all movie’s characters. The findings suggest that Miles has used four types of power bases to control his friends; reward power, coercive power, referent power, and legitimate power. Furthermore, Miles was able to control his friends by disrupting their psychological awareness in chaotic situations such as the disappearance of Duke's gun and cellphone to manipulate the situation as well as the reason of Duke’s death.


Keywords


power, manipulation, main character, Miles Bron, Glass Onion movie.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bailo, P. (2017). Multi-generational Differences in Perception of Coercive Power in the Workplace : Senior Executive Coercive Power. Journal of Management and Innovation, 3(1), 1–17.

Blass, R. (2005). Manipulation in speeches and writings of Hitler and the NSDAP from a relevance theoretic point of view. In L. de Saussure & P. Schulz (Eds.), Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century (Issue 7, pp. 169–190). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Buller, D. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1993). Deception: Strategic and nonstrategic Communication. In Strategic Interpersonal Communication (pp. 191–223). Martis Graphic.

French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In Power and Influence in Group (pp. 259–269).

Idrus, A. (2020). The effect of coercive power and reward toward teacher’s job satisfaction. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 12(5), 491–504.

Issac, A. C., Bednall, T. C., Baral, R., Magliocca, P., & Dhir, A. (2022). The effects of expert power and referent power on knowledge sharing and knowledge hiding. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(2), 383–403. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2021-0750

Kovach, M. (2020). Leader Influence: A Research Review of French & Raven’s (1959) Power Dynamics. Journal of Values-Based Leadership, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.22543/0733.132.1312

Lunenburg, F. C. (2012). Power and Leadership: An Influence Process. International Journal of Management, Bussiness, and Administration, 15(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678303600207

Madsen, L. M. (2003). Linguistic Power Wielding and Manipulation Strategies in Group Conversations Between Turkish-Danish Children. In J. N. Jørgensen, A. Dahl, & P. Svenonius (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics (Vol. 31, Issue 5, pp. 780–795). https://doi.org/10.7557/12.38

Manzaila, D. (2013). Power and Domination on Utterances Used By The Main Character of The Help Movie.

Parveen, Huma, and Nayeem Showkat. 2017. “Content Analysis.” in Communications Research.

Pratto, F., Tan, J., Pitpitan, V., & Lee, I. (2007). Power Basis Theory: A Psychoecological Approach to Power. In Social Motivation (Issue January, pp. 191–222). Psychology Press.

Puji Hariati, Anni Holila Pulungan, & Rahmad Husein. (2020). Illocutionary Acts in Jack Ma’s Inspiring Speech in His Graduation at The University of Hongkong. Britain International of Linguistics Arts and Education (BIoLAE) Journal, 2(1), 384–394. https://doi.org/10.33258/biolae.v2i1.209

Ratri, A., & Ardi, P. (2019). Power and Impoliteness in The Devil Wears Prada Movie. Elite Journal, 6(1), 33–50.

Saussure, L. de. (2005). Manipulation and cognitive pragmatics: Preliminary hypotheses. In L. de Saussure & P. Schulz (Eds.), Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century (Issue 5, pp. 113–146). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Siahaan, S. (2021). A comparative analysis of the main characters’ manipulations Between “The Talented Mr.Ripley “and “To Die For” movies. Anglo-Saxon : Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 12(1), 31–42.

Sorm, S., & Gunbayi, I. (2018). SCHOOL LEADERSHIP: THE EXERCISE OF LEGITIMATE POWER IN CAMBODIA. European Journal of Education Studies, 4(5), 256–284. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1238513

Vadai, K. (2016). Critical Discourse Analysis in Progress: The Power, Ideology and Manipulation Identification (PIMI) Model. Alkalmazott Nyelvtudomány, XVI(1). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18460/ANY.2016.1.004

White, Marilyn Domas, and Emily E. Marsh. 2006. “Content Analysis: A Flexible Methodology.” Library Trends 55(1):22–45. doi: 10.1353/lib.2006.0053.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30813/jelc.v13i2.4225

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.