The Effect of Predicting Strategy for Listening Comprehension in EFL Classroom on the Third Year Students (academic year 2012) at English Department in FKIP Universitas HKBP Nommensen Pematangsiantar

Bobby P. S. Dhillon, Bertaria Sohnata Hutauruk

Abstract


This research will tend to find out the significance and the effect predicting strategy for Listening Comprehension in EFL classroom on the third year students (Academic Year 2012) at English Department in FKIP Universitas HKBP Nommensen Pematangsiantar. This research will use experimental research design. To answer the problems of the research, the writer uses the following theories: Nunan (2003), Ellis & Sinclair (1997), Rost (1999), Miller (2000:25), Richards and Rodgers (1986:16), Anthony (1963:15), Buck (1999), Flowerdew (1994), Swain (2000), Chamot (1999;15), Anderson and Lynch (1988), Harmer(1983), and Tiwari (2005). The population of this research is the third year students (Academic Year 2012) at English Department that sit in Listening Comprehension in FKIP Universitas HKBP Nommensen Pematangsiantar. There are 90 students taken as the sample of this research. The sample was divided into two groups: the first group (30 students) as the experimental group and the second group (30 students) as the control group. The writers will give a treatment in the class by using predicting strategy in teaching listening comprehension. The data obtained from the score of experimental group and the score of the control group were calculated by applying t-test formula. (1) the result shows that  t-observed > t-table = 6.13 > 2.00 (p=0.05; df=58). It indicates that Prediction strategy gave significant effect to the students’ listening comprehension. The students who were taught by using Prediction Strategy got higher score than those who were taught without using Prediction Strategy, (2) Teaching listening by using Prediction Strategy makes the students become active listeners and give them a better chance of general comprehension. While, the common situation found in the classroom shows that teacher often test listening skill rather than teach it. It makes listening class be passive and the students are not motivated (3) The difference of the mean scores in the pre-test and post-test of both experimental and control group were calculated by using t-test formula to find t-observed. T-test formula was used to assess whether the means score of experimental group and control group are different from each other, (4) From the calculation, it is found that t-observed (6,13) is higher than t-table (2.00). Thus, alternative hypothesis (Ha) is accepted.

 

Keywords: predicting strategy, listening comprehension, teaching

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amato, P.A.R. and Snow, A 1998. Academic Success For English Language Learners. New York; Longman

Anderson, R, and Lynch, T. 1988. listening. In Nunan, D. (Ed), Practical English Language Teaching.Maschusetss: Heinle and Heinle

Arikunto, S.1988, Proses Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek( edisi revisi V) Jakarta Bhineka Cipta

Bachman, L. F. 1990. Fundamental consideration in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University

Best, J,W and Kahn,V. J. 2002. Research in Education. New Delhi: Prentice Hall

Brown, H.D.2004. Language Assesment: Principles and Classroom Practices. New York: Pearson Education.

Buck, G.1999. Teaching Listening. In Rost, M., Teaching and Researching Listening, Harlow: Pearson Education, pp.137-143

Chamot, A.U.et.al.1999. Learning Strategy Handbook. New York; Pearson Education

Cohen, A. 1994.Teaching Listening. In Rost,M.,Teaching and Researching Listening. Harlow: Pearson Education,pp. 137-143

Ellis, G. and Sinclair, B. 1997.Learning to Learn English. In http://le.ust.hk/centre/conf 2004/Sinclair.html.accessed on September, 7th 2012

Harmer, J. 1983.The Practice of English Language Teaching (First Edition). New York: Longman

Holden, R.W. 2000. Facilitating Listening Comprehension in ELT.In http://udedition.cast.org/strategypredict.html. Accesed on on Sepetember 15th 2012

Miller, L.A. 2000.Facilitating Listening Comprehension in ELT. In http://udedition.cast.org/strategypredict.html.accessed on August 15th 2012

Nunan, D. 1999. Second Language Teaching and Learning. Massachusetts: Heinle and Heinle

Richards, C.J. and Rodgers, S.T. 1986. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. London: Cambridge University.

Rost, M. 2002. Teaching and Researching Listening. England: Pearson Education.

Sheerin, S. 1987.Listening Comprehension: Teaching or Testing. ELT Journal, vol.41,pp.2. Oxford University.In www.51share.net/down.asp?id=83278. Accessed on August 15th 2012

Smith, F. 1987. A Practical Study of Ways to Improve English Listening Comprehension in High Schools. Report of the faculty of education, Gumma University, cultural science series vol.40,pp.53-69

Swain, M. 2000. Teaching Listening. In Rost, M., Teaching and Researching Listening. Harlow: Pearson Education

Tiwari, D. 2005. Encyclopedia of Modern Methods of Teaching, New Delhi: Crescent

Weir, C.J. 1990.Communicative Language Testing. Wiltshire: Prentice Hall International (UKI)




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30813/jelc.v6i2.246

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.