The studies about language use in the past several years showed the existence of gender inequalities. According to Lakoff (1975), women are pressured to show the feminine qualities of weakness and frequently subordinate status toward men in a male-dominated society. However, nowadays, women's position in society is equal to men's position. The evidence that women are now equal to men invites the writer to study men's and women's language features and the politeness strategies used by men and women, especially in CMC (Computer-Mediated Communication). This study was a Qualitative Content Analysis (QCA) study used to describe the meaning of qualitative data systematically. The result did not align with the previous studies: it showed that women were also aggressive when giving an argument, and politeness strategies were not the most used in the forum discussion; it was bald of record instead. In sum, Herring's (1993) features of women's and men's language were not valid in this study, and some of them need to be revised. Further studies about politeness strategies in CMC should be explored more.

politeness strategies; language features; computer-mediated communication (CMC)

Amakye, A. (2010). He says, she says: Do they 'say' in the same way? A case study of gendered online communication. Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences.

Androutsopoulos, J. (2014). Computer-mediated Communication and Linguistic Landscapes. In J. Holmes, & K. Hazen, Research Methods in Sociolinguistics: A Practical Guide (pp. 74-90). Malden: Wiley Blackwell.

Bengsch, G. (2010). The influence of culture on the perception of politeness: an investigation of front-line staffs at a mid-priced hotel chain in New Zealand. Dissertation of Master Unitec New Zealand.1-145.

Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals In Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Coulmas, F. (2006). Sociolinguistics: The Study of Speaker's Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Goffman, E. (1967). On facework: an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. In Jaworski, A., & Coupland, N. (Eds.), The Discourse Reader (pp. 306-321). London: Routledge.

Guiller, J., & Durndell, A. (2007). Students' linguistic behaviour in online discussion groups: Does gender matter? Computers in Human Behavior(23 (5)), 2240-2255.

Herring, S. C. (1993). Gender and democracy in computer mediated communication. Electronic Journal of Communication. Retrieved Desember 10, 2014, from http://www.cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/003/2/00328.HTML

Herring, S. C. (1994). Politeness in computer culture: Why women thank and men flame. In M. Bucholtz, A. Liang and L. Sutton (eds), Cultural Performances: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Women and Language Conference, 278-94. Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group.

Herring, S. C. (1996). Philosophical Perspectives on Computer-Mediated Communication. In gender and ethics in computer-mediated communication (pp. 115-145). Albany: SUNY Press.

Herring, S. C. (1999). The rhetorical dynamics of gender harassment online. The Information Society 15 (3), 151 – 167. Special issue on The Rhetorics of Gender in Computer-Mediated Communication, ed. By L.J. Gurak.

Herring, S. C. (2000). Gender Differences in CMC: Findings and Implications. Computer Professionals For Social Responsibility Newsletter. Retrieved April 7, 2015, from http://cpsr.org/issues/womenintech/herring/.

Herring, S. C. (2001). Computer-Mediated Discourse. In D. Tannen, D. Schiffrin, & H. Hamilton, The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 612-634). Oxford: Blackwell.

Herring, S. C. (2003). Gender and power in online communication. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The Handbook of Language and Gender. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 202-228.

Katz, M. (2015). Politeness theory and the classification of speech acts. Working Papers of the Linguistics Circle of the University of Victoria.(25 (2)), 45-55.

Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Woman's Place. New York: Harper and Row.

Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.

Maros, M., & Rosli, L. (n.d.). Politeness Strategies in Twitter Updates of Female English Language Studies Malaysian Undergraduates. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies (23 (1)), 132 – 149. doi:http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2017-2301-10

Nevala, N. (2015). FEMALE STYLE VS. MALE STYLE OR SOMETHING IN BETWEEN? A case study on gendered communication on the Humans of New York Facebook page. University of Jyväskylä Department of Languages English.

Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Thousand Oaks (Calif.): Sage Publications.

Smith, C, B., Margaret L. M & Kerry K. O. (1997). Conduct controls on Usenet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2, (4).

Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. New York, NY: William Morrow.

World Nuclear Association. (n.d.). Retrieved from Safety of Nuclear Power Reactors: https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/safety-and-security/safety-of-plants/safety-of-nuclear-power-reactors.aspx

Yates, S. J. (1997). Gender, identity and CMC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 281-290.