This study aims to reveal conditions that have been neglected so far regarding the development of communication technology in online transportation. With a large number of partners, the company provides features to service users to provide an assessment of online motorcycle taxi drivers. Companies are no longer present to discipline their workers with strict regulations, but by using a panopticon monitoring system that is delegated to service users. This study uses a qualitative approach by conducting surveys and interviews with online motorcycle taxi drivers and users. The results of the participant interviews were then analyzed and supported by documentation studies originating from books, journals, and some data obtained from online media, or also known as data triangulation. The results of the study show that the panopticon system implemented by the company provides certainty of supervision so that it forms the discipline of those who are supervised by forming homogeneous behavior. The power relations that occur between companies and their partners place online motorcycle taxi drivers in a vulnerable position to symbolic violence through supervision. 

Adams, S. (2013). POST-PANOPTIC SURVEILLANCE THROUGH HEALTHCARE RATING SITES. Information, Communication & Society, 16(2), 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.701657

Albrechtslund, A. (1969). Online social networking as participatory surveillance. First Monday, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v13i3.2142

Amorim, H., & Moda, F. (2020). Work by app: algorithmic management and working conditions of Uber drivers in Brazil. Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation, 14(1), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.13169/workorgalaboglob.14.1.0101

Andrejevic, M. (2006). The Discipline of Watching: Detection, Risk, and Lateral Surveillance. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 23(5), 391–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393180601046147

Basturk, E. (2017). A BRIEF ANALYSE ON POST PANOPTIC SURVEILLANCE: DELEUZE&GUATTARIAN APPROACH. International Journal of Social Sciences, VI(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.20472/SS2017.6.2.001

Bataona, M. R. (2021). Anatomi Histeria Publik dan Panopticon: Dekonstruksi Arsitektur Komunikasi di Masa Pandemi. Communicatus: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 5(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.15575/cjik.v5i1.12643

Caluya, G. (2010). The post-panoptic society? Reassessing Foucault in surveillance studies. Social Identities, 16(5), 621–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2010.509565

Catriana, E. (2022, February 11). Rating Driver Ojol Diberi Bintang 1, Apa Dampak dan Sanksinya?

Chan, J., & Wang, J. (2018). Hiring Preferences in Online Labor Markets: Evidence of a Female Hiring Bias. Management Science, 64(7), 2973–2994. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2756

Couch, D. L., Robinson, P., & Komesaroff, P. A. (2020). COVID-19-Extending Surveillance and the Panopticon. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 17(4), 809–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-020-10036-5

Creswell, J. C. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage Publication.

de Moya, J., & Pallud, J. (2020). From panopticon to heautopticon: A new form of surveillance introduced by quantified‐self practices. Information Systems Journal, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12284

de Ruyter, A., & Rachmawati, R. (2020). Understanding the Working Conditions of Gig Workers and Decent Work: Evidence from Indonesia’s online Ojek Riders. Sozialpolitik.Ch, 2, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.18753/2297-8224-159

Ford, M., & Honan, V. (2019). The limits of mutual aid: Emerging forms of collectivity among app-based transport workers in Indonesia. Journal of Industrial Relations, 0(0), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185619839428

Foucault, M. (1995a). Discipline and Punish. Vintage Books.

Foucault, M. (1995b). Discipline and Punish. Vintage Books.

Gane, N. (2012). The Governmentalities of Neoliberalism: Panopticism, Post-Panopticism and beyond. The Sociological Review, 60(4), 611–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02126.x

Gill, S. (1995). The Global Panopticon? The Neoliberal State, Economic Life, and Democratic Surveillance. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 20(1), 1–49.

Haryatmoko. (2016). Mambongkar Rezim Kepastian. PT Kanisius.

Humphreys, L. (2013). Mobile Social Network and Surveillance:

Users’ Perspectives. In A. Jansson & M. Christensen (Eds.), Media, Surveillance, and Identity: A Social Perspectives (Vol. 82). Peter Lang.

Jarrahi, M. H., Newlands, G., Lee, M. K., Wolf, C. T., Kinder, E., & Sutherland, W. (2021). Algorithmic management in a work context. Big Data & Society, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211020332

Kaine, S., & Josserand, E. (2019). The organisation and experience of work in the gig economy. Journal of Industrial Relations, 0(0), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185619865480

Keshet, Y. (2020). Fear of panoptic surveillance: using digital technology to control the COVID-19 epidemic. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-020-00429-7

Manokha, I. (2018). Surveillance, Panopticism, and Self-Discipline in the Digital Age. Surveillance & Society, 16(2), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v16i2.8346

Rachmawati, R., Safitri, Zakia, L., Lupita, A., & de Ruyter, A. (2021). Urban gig workers in Indonesia during COVID-19: The experience of online ‘ojek’ drivers. Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation, 15(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.13169/workorgalaboglob.15.1.0031

Sadono, T. P. R. M. J. (2015). PEMBENTUKAN PERSEPSI WARNA PADA KONSUMEN. Bricolage, 1(1), 100–113.

Salim, B., & Ihalauw, J. J. O. I. (2017). TRANSFORMASI MODEL BISNIS GO-JEK UNTUK KEUNGGULAN-KOMPETITIF DALAM PERKEMBANGAN EKONOMI-BERBAGI DARI SUDUT PANDANG PELANGGAN. Journal of Business & Applied Management, 10(02), 106–123. https://doi.org/10.30813/jbam.v10i02.931

Sasongko, Y. P. D. M. R. F. (2018). Ekspresi Identitas Melalui Relasi Ayah dan Anak Pada Iklan Youtube Grab Official. Bricolage, 4(2), 118–209.

Shafiei Gol, E., Stein, M.-K., & Avital, M. (2019). Crowdwork platform governance toward organizational value creation. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.001

Tan, D. (2021). A Brave New Frontier in The Dichotomous Indonesian Labour Law: Gig Economy, Platform paradox and Workers Without Employers. Mimbar Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 33(1), 1–38.

Tarsani. (2016). STRATEGI KOMUNIKASI PEMASARAN DOMPET DHUAFA DALAM MENINGKATKAN KEPERCAYAAN MUZAKKI. Bricolage, 2(1), 56–70.

Turner, B. S. (2007). Book Reviews: Extended Review: Justification, the City and Late Capitalism. The Sociological Review, 55(2), 410–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00712_1.x

Veen, A., Barratt, T., & Goods, C. (2020). Platform-Capital’s ‘App-etite’ for Control: A Labour Process Analysis of Food-Delivery Work in Australia. Work, Employment and Society, 34(3), 388–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017019836911

Walton, S. (2021). Chapter Title: Social relations: social availability Book Title: Ageing with Smartphones in Urban Italy Book Subtitle: Care and community in Milan and beyond. UCL Press.

Wardhana, V. H. K., Herlina, M. G., Bangsawan, S., & Tuori, M. A. T. (2020). Regulatory Developments in the Gig Economy: A Literature Review. The Winners, 21(2), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.21512/tw.v21i2.6758

Whitaker, R. (1999). The End of Privacy: How Total Surveillance is Becoming a Reality. The New Press.

Yin, R. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications Design and Methods. Sage Publication.