The experience of interacting: Learning communication for deaf students

Linangkung Diah Ayu Rengganis, Asep Suryana, Uud Wahyudin, Sri Eka Yati, Budi Santoso

Abstract


In the school environment in addition to studying teaching materials, deaf students also explore a variety of vocabulary. Teachers have a more role, in addition to helping students' understanding of communication teaching materials, it is also needed as a means of enriching vocabulary, including honing students in understanding oral communication, namely reading lip movements. The hope is that when deaf people can understand vocabulary and sign language, communication with sign language becomes equivalent to vocal communication in general which can make them confident in communicating with anyone. During the process, everything cannot be separated from the teacher's intervention in educating, exposing the material, and honing the potential of his students. Based on this phenomenon, researchers will examine the meaning of learning communication in teachers towards deaf people as research objects. This study aimed to determine the learning communication experience of deaf students at SLBN Cicendo, Bandung. It uses Symbolic Interaction Theory developed by George Herbert Mead as a guide. The approach used in this study is qualitative with a phenomenology method. The data in this study were obtained through observation, in-depth interviews, and a literature study. The results of this study indicate that learning communication in deaf students begins with the things closest to the children. These things can be experiences or what the child is thinking. The teacher as a teacher will lead the opinion on the material to be taught at that time. Then the teaching given is also adjusted to the abilities possessed by each child. The conclusion of this research is the provision of teaching materials to deaf students guided by individual learning. How to find out the best learning techniques for deaf students are obtained through the experience of interacting between classroom teachers and students.

 


Keywords


learning communication, individual learning, deaf students, Symbolic interaction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ainiyah, N. (2016). Identitas Diri dan Makna Guru Profesional sebagai Komunikator Pendidikan (Perspektif Fenomenologis). Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Indonesia, 1(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.35316/jpii.v1i1.32

Arumsari, A. (2021). Strategi belajar membaca untuk anak tunarungu. Refleksi Edukatika:Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 12(1), 1–9.

Cresswell. (2008). Research Design. Pustaka Belajar.

Efendi, H., & Inayati, N. L. (2020). Metode Pengajaran Tahfidz Al-Qur’an Pada Anak Tunarungu Di Sekolah Menengah Pertama Luar Biasa Yayasan Asuhan Anak Tuna Surakarta. Iseedu: Journal of Islamic Educational Thoughts and Practices, 4(1), 136–152. https://doi.org/10.23917/iseedu.v4i1.14332

Effendy, O. U. (2003). Ilmu Teori dan Filsafat Komunikasi. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Hutapea, E. B. (2015). Representasi Simbol-simbol Komunikasi Menjadi Realitas. BRICOLAGE: Jurnal Magister Ilmu Komunikasi, 1(2), 1–26.

Irwanto, F., Iswari, M., & Efrina, E. (2018). Efektivitas Metode Maternal Reflektif dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Bahasa Anak Tunarungu. Jurnal Pendidikan Kebutuhan Khusus, 2(2), 25. https://doi.org/10.24036/jpkk.v2i2.140

Juherna, E., Purwanti, E., Melawati, & Utami, yuni S. (2020). Implementasi Pendidikan Karakter pada Disabilitas Anak Tunarungu. Jurnal Golden Age, 4(01), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.29408/jga.v4i01.1809

Lestari, W., & Zulmiyetri, Z. (2019). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Membaca Kata Melalui Media Video Pembelajaran Bagi Anak Tunarungu. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Kebutuhan Khusus, 7(1), 71–76.

Mahadi, U. (2021). Komunikasi Pendidikan (Urgensi Komunikasi Efektif dalam Proses Pembelajaran). JOPPAS: Journal of Public Policy and Administration Silampari, 2(2), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.31539/joppa.v2i2.2385

Putu, yulia. (2019). Hubungan Gaya Komunikasi Guru Terhadap Tingkat Keefektifan Proses Pembelajaran. Jurnal Agama Dan Budaya, 3(2), 71–78. http://jurnal.stahnmpukuturan.ac.id/index.php/Purwadita

Sucia, V. (2016). Pengaruh Gaya Komunikasi Guru Terhadap. Jurnal Komunikasi dan Teknologi Informasi. doi: 10.23917/komuniti.v8i5.2942 VIII(2), 112–126.

Sugiono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Alfabeta.

Taufik, R. R. (2015). Pengelolaan pesan non verbal pada komunikasi siswa autis di SLB LOB ABCDE. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 2(1), 63–70.

Thadi, R. (2019). Proses Komunikasi Instruksional Dalam Pembelajaran Vokasional. Journal of Education and Instruction (JOEAI), 8(5), 55.

Winarsih, M. (2007). Intervensi Dini Bagi Anak Tunarungu dalam Pemerolehan Bahasa. Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi. Direktorat Ketenagaan.

Yurisma, D. Y., & Bahruddin, M. (2020). Pemaknaan Simbol Reog Ponorogo Dalam Tradisi Jawa : Sebuah Kajian Kritis Meaning of the Ponorogo Reog Symbol in the Java Tradition : A Critical Study. Magister Ilmu Komunikasi, 6(1), 101–116.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30813/bricolage.v9i1.3890

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Accredited by:

          

 

Indexed by:

  

        

UNIVERSITAS BUNDA MULIA PRESS

PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU KOMUNIKASI
Lantai 3 Ruang Pascasarjana - Universitas Bunda Mulia
Jl. Lodan Raya No. 2, Ancol – Jakarta Utara 14430, Indonesia
Telp: +62 21 692 9090 ext.1317
Email: bricolage@ubm.ac.id; bricolage.mikom@gmail.com

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats